Complete two annotated bibliographies for each week’s assignment.AB’s should be ½ to ¾ pages long.

It should be double-spaced, and you are to use Times new Roman 12 font. For your AB, you must have:

  • Your name, date, course, and AB number at the top (see example)
  • APA Reference before the information (see example) Annotated bibliographies must be written in manner, in which, they are understandable. You must describe all-important data such as:
  • The participants • The reason the study was conducted
  • What research design was used (surveys, interviews, case study, etc.)
  • Which research analysis was used (MANOVA, ANOVA, Kruskal Wallace, etc.)
  • The results of the study along with any conclusions of the author(s) Your study must include all of these (if applicable). Your AB MAY NOT be copied and pasted directly from the source. There MUST NOT be any form of plagiarism in your annotated bibliography (or any other assignment). You are required to write this assignment in your own words. You should pick the topic for your AB from the objectives listed at the beginning of each week’s module or from the syllabus.
  • Ministers and Partisan Affiliation. Methodological proposal applied to the Argentine case


    Partisan affiliation of ministers is a key analytical dimension in the study of government, cabinets being an integral aspect of the most basic categorizations of the literature. Here we argue that the most widespread operational criterion for dealing with the phenomenon, valid for a large part of consolidated parliamentary democracies, may prove inefficient and inadequate for systems with strong heads of government and fluid political organizations like the Latin American presidential regimes. The article identifies four operational challenges associated with the standard modality of codifying partisan ministers; proposes a methodological strategy to account for them, and discusses their practical application with an exploratory analysis of the Argentine case.…

    2)Paleobasins – a new concept of modeling the history of geological development and oil and gas bearing of regions


    “Paleobasin” is an area of long-term and steady subsidence of the Earth’s crust at a certain stage of geological development in the past, during which a body of sedimentary rocks of a mega-regional scale is formed, subsequently subjected to the influence of various kinds of geological processes leading to a reduction in its size, as well as changes in geometry and structure. Paleobasin is not a new concept. However, for petroleum, historical analysis was used only for those sedimentary strata that were not metamorphosed or collapsed into folds. As a result, the side zones of the basins and deep horizons were excluded from the basin modeling. The proposed approach to the analysis of paleobasins, regardless of the degree of their subsequent transformation, makes it possible to assess the petroleum potential of past eras, both primary and residual, especially in those zones and horizons that were previously derived from a general consideration of the prospects for finding oil and gas. The article shows the need for an integrated historical approach to the analysis of the oil and gas potential of the territory, both at the basin level and at the local level, including sedimentary strata and strata, which are often referred to as the “acoustic foundation”. Unfortunately, very often when modeling a promising object and assessing its resources or reserves, some of these attributes are taken for the type of work already done and do not adapt to a single model of oil and gas deposits, which reduces the reliability of the final result.…

    "Is this question part of your assignment? We can help"