1) Do you agree with Philip K. Howard (TedTalk video speaker) that laws should
be simplified? What are some benefits and disadvantages to having simplified
laws? If laws were simplified, why would judges and authorities need more
leeway/discretion to interpret and apply them?
2) Why do courts generally adhere to judicial precedents set by earlier decisions
(the doctrine of StareDecisis)? What challenges would arise if courts either (i)
always strictly adhered to the doctrine of StareDecisis, or (ii) never adhered to the
doctrine of StareDecisis?
Note: 1 page each answer.
Look into the link for reference https://www.ted.com/talks/philip_howard
Look into the attached videos for reference