Read Case Study 3.1 and “Government Saw Flood Risk but Not Levee Failure.

nswer Questions 1 and 3 at the end of Case Study 3.1.

Each question should be answered in an essay format of approximately
250-500 words. Ensure your paper answers the questions and uses concepts
studied in the module and from both readings. Support your answers with
personal experiences, current events, and references to the readings.

Use the GCU library to locate four to six scholarly sources to support your analysis.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the
APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is
not required.

Government Saw Flood Risk but Not Levee Failure

Read “Government Saw Flood Risk but Not Levee Failure” to complete the Katrina Breakdown assignment.http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/02/national/nationalspecial/02response.html?_r=1

here you can read case study ( http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/02/us/nationalspeci… )

and below are questions

1. Which of the three perspectives do you find most persuasive?
Least persuasive? Support your answer.

3. Setting aside the philosophical and legal issues this case
raises, what are the management or efficiency arguments for and
against a more centralized response to large national disasters like
Hurricane Katrina? Why would we not want to have a federal fire
department? If the federal government tells the states and cities they
will receive no assistance in the event of a disaster, what do you
think will happen?