business law class 2

Do you require help with your paper? Use our custom writing service to achieve better grades and meet your deadlines. Trust our team of writing experts with your work today, and enjoy peace of mind.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

Here I need 2 pages for that class ..

 

And this is the assigment : 

 

M3 Discussion (original post)

 

Jun 11, 2013 at 11:56am
 

 

 

Original Post:

“After reading the case, assume you are a lawyer,  your client, Google has been sued by the Company, Perfect 10 for copyright infringement.  Google comes to you for advice.  What would you advise Google to do?
Consider:
1. the inherent powers of the court to decide copyright issues
2. rights of both parties with regard to intellectual property issues under copyright law.
3. remedies discussed in the case and your book
4. other issues discussed by the court

You, as a lawyer must be objective and NOT  insert your personal beliefs in the answer.  Use the IRAC analytical format to  respond to each separate issue you find (there are more issues than listed)” 

 You may do additional internet research,   the search terms “Google”  and “9th Circuit”  will be helpful.

Response Posts: Respond to the posts of at least 2 other students.

Note: This response will be due two weeks from today.  This will give each student enough time to read and understand this case as well as promote a thoughtful discussion.

Click here for help on completing a Discussion Board post
See Calendar above for original post and response post due dates. Be sure that this course is selected in the side menu

Response Posts: Respond to the posts of at least 2 other students.

Click here for help on completing a Discussion Board post
See Calendar above for original post and response post due dates. Be sure that this course is selected in the side menu

 

 

 

 

_____________________________________________________________________________________

 

This will be the rubric used to evaluate your case submissions with the one exception that is noted in the Module 5.

 

IRAC Grading Rubric

 

 

 

IRAC/Case Analysis Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

 

Issue

view longer description

Clearly identifies the relevant issue of the case

5 pts

Identifies the issue but is not a clear and concise statement

4 pts

Can see an issue but does not properly address it

3 pts

Having difficulty concentrating on the issue.

2 pts

Does not understand the issue

1 pts

No Marks

0 pts

 pts 

 

Delete Criterion Link

 

Rule

view longer description

Concisely states the rule

5 pts

Mostly states the rule

4 pts

Partially states the rule

3 pts

Vaguely states the rule

2 pts

Does not state the correct rule

1 pts

No Marks

0 pts

 pts 

 

Delete Criterion Link

 

Analysis

view longer description

Clearly shows an understanding how the law applies to the facts.

5 pts

States how the facts and the law relate

4 pts

Does not clearly state how the facts and law relate

3 pts

Does not connect the facts or the law

2 pts

Unable to apply the law to the facts

1 pts

No Marks

0 pts

 pts 

 

Delete Criterion Link

 

Conclusion

view longer description

Clearly and Concisely states the conclusion

5 pts

States a good conclusion

4 pts

States a conclusion that is not concise but still on point

3 pts

States a conclusion

2 pts

Does not state a conclusion

1 pts

No Marks

0 pts

 pts 

 

Delete Criterion Link

 

What you learned

view longer description

Clearly states what the case taught you

5 pts

States what the case is about (paraphrases case)

4 pts

States the case verbatim or interjected personal feelings into the response

3 pts

States ideas not connected to the case

2 pts

 

Did not understand the case.

1 pts

No Marks

0 pts

 pts 

 

Delete Criterion Link

 

Content and Quality Connections

view longer description

Response is thoughtful, contains substantive insight and analysis in relation to topic. makes strong connections to readings, lecture, experience, workplace

5 pts

Response(s) demonstrate significant understanding. Robust insight and analysis. Evidence of connections.

4 pts

Content response is accurate but superficial. Some responses may be off topic. Acknowledges connections exist.

3 pts

Lacks depth; responses too general, conclusory, simplistic in nature. Some aspects of response are off topic. Posts lack connections.

2 pts

Interjected emotional responses, personal feelings, and /or beliefs in analysis

1 pts

No Marks

0 pts

 pts 

 

Delete Criterion Link

 

Total Points: 30

 

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

 

"Is this question part of your assignment? We can help"

ORDER NOW
Writerbay.net

Do you need help with this or a different assignment? We offer CONFIDENTIAL, ORIGINAL (Turnitin/LopesWrite/SafeAssign checks), and PRIVATE services using latest (within 5 years) peer-reviewed journal articles. Kindly click on ORDER NOW to receive an A++ paper from our masters- and PhD writers.

Get a 15% discount on your order using the following coupon code SAVE15


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper