What happened with regards to LM including why LM was audited given its nature and the law covering which organisations require an audit.

Western Sydney University Legal Responsibilities of the Auditor Case Study

Western Sydney University

Question Description

 

This assignment is comprised is a single academic paper discussing a case, and is marked out of 20marks.

The marking rubric below sets out the requirements:

Principally you will be marked on four components:

  • What happened with regards to LM including why LM was audited given its nature and the law covering which organisations require an audit.
  • Legal issues both from a statue perspective (corporate law) and other legal issues.
  • Ethical issues
  • Format, Presentation Quality and Demonstration of Research

(10marks for each component)

 

As mentioned above, the assessmentshould be presented in an academic paper format.

A key aspect in your choice of format/layout should be to ensure you impart your key messages effectively (i.e., complete the requirements) and efficiently (i.e., it should be succinct and take into account the word limit).

Make sure all pages are numbered, and the text fits within the margins of your pages. Make sure to include the relevant heading.

Required:

Discuss the underlying reasons behind the appearance at the Company Auditors Discipline board of Reginald Williams.

Couch your discussion to cover the four points indicated above.


Marking Criteria and Rubric

 

Met requirements of the learning outcomes a, and b to an excellent level

(80 to 100%)

Met requirement of the learning outcomes a, and b to a very good level

(70 to 79%)

Met requirementof the learning outcomes a, and b to a good level

(60 to 69%)

Met requirement of the learning outcomes a, and bto asatisfactory level

(50 to 59%)

Did not met requirement

(0 to 49%)

Part 1 (out of 10 marks) Fully researched and thoroughly covered all Requirements in depth and detail Soundly researched and covered all points A good development of all points Allpoints were covered Did not cover all points
Part 2 (out of 10 marks) Fully researched and thoroughly covered all Requirements in depth and Soundly researched and covered all points A good development of all points Allpoints were covered Did not cover all points
Part 3 (out of 10 marks) Fully researched and thoroughly covered all Requirements in depth and Soundly researched and covered all points A good development of all points Allpoints were covered Did not cover all points
Part 4 (out of 10 marks) Proper structure language and grammar and full evidence of supporting research Proper structure and language and good evidence of research Basic structure and grammar and evidence of research Readable language

Some evidence of research

Poor grammar and little or no research
Grand Total Mark (Out of 40)
Unit Mark Contribution (Out of 20%)

"Is this question part of your assignment? We can help"

ORDER NOW