Crimes Mala in se and Mala Prohibita
No doubt, some human behavior is by far, wrong, even evil, and cannot be accepted by the majority of morally rational humans. I do not think ethnicity play a significant role in rape, murder, and cannibalism; it does not matter the ethnicity that takes ones dignity, cause death, or even decided to cannibalize another human, for instance like Jeffery Dahmer did. The crimes committed in his present was truly wrong (mala in se) and no matter how it was perceived by other humans that death at the hands of another humans is wrong (mala in se).
Here again, it is my thought and belief that murder and forcible rape are criminal actions that can and are considered wrong (mala in se). The unauthorized dismantling of an individual’s existence at the hands of another person is criminal act that have damaging consequences on the individual. An individual should always know the extinct of the crime they are committing and the severity as well.
Now, when analyzing the mala prohibita actions one will find that robbery, burglary, and forced physical attacks to be crimes that are prohibited. Perhaps, due to the nature of the urbane environment physical altercations like fights are undesirable actions especially in public.
“Might say mala prohibita and mala in se are extremely close in terms especially when comparing each with natural crimes and legal crimes. I would have to agree due to the only thing that distinguishes the two is, one directly violates the law while the other is considered a societal evil.”(Limbaugh)
However, one must not lose sight that the ethical manner of the public must not be overlooked as well while trying to understand the way that crimes are classified and punished applied to the convicted of crimes.
Steven Limbaugh by Natural Crimes and Legal Crimes